Change Solo Leaderboards

I could see some of your points (not agree, but I see why you say what you do), but this one is ludicrous. The presence of cheaters is never beneficial to a game. It would be better to have a smaller population than to have more cheaters. Cheaters don't help other players. Usually they are solo to "avoid" detection and when the do play in groups, they often play with other cheaters. "Birds of a feather flock together" as the saying goes. What would be better would be if BP could figure out some live detection methods to stop cheaters before they ever have a chance to start.

And on topic relating to this comment, cheaters certainly hurt the leaderboards, so again, they have no place in the game. No fair play player can compete with a bot and still have anything resembling a life.

 

Well said. Botters make more people leave equals harm than having them gone. Some are probably addicted enough and will start all over.

 

Thats why imo they should run bot scan waves every week or so in order to provide to the rest of the players some fair leaderboards.Not doing so after so many reported multiple botters who go om nom nom on them leaderboards only proves that BP doesnt care for everyone to have a fair competition.Its all about the $.

When this game made it on the market, them guys in the dev team had ideals, morals.Now they dont.You pay, you can cheat as much as u want, its how DSO works nowadays.Just look at those top payer botters reported on youtube for months and they still cheat.What did BP do to them? Nothing ^_^

You have to be really special to support a game which aproves of this type of behaviour.#keepPaying