Lor'Tac Easter Eggs and Hidden Achievement

That would stir a lot of "kill steal" arguments, and then very few would still do it in a group... which would be kinda bad since maybe not everyone can solo them out.

 

about titles, i think it would be awesome to have different stats from them, perhaps only avaible on pve (we dont want to mess with pvp more, and i dont have a solid opinion there, since i dont do pvp)

let's say x title, for example mushroom, it could give us 3% hp and armor, just saying, and each title could have different stats,

i think that would be cool

 

Hmm. Possibly viable idea... but I don't know if the guys at DSO are willing to give us another exterior boost (like the pet, for example... meaning not related to gear). Would be cool, but then they would turn from vanity "items" to actual game-affecting stuff... this sounds like how people said costumes should have some stats. I'm not sure how I feel about that, but I look forward to other people's opinions on this.

 

ok , look at it this way , Why should players be able to go afk and or just stand there and still get the credit ? Also the titles are not suppose to be "easy" to get so yes it will be hard but isnt some of the others say wind of death title?

 

Of course leeches shouldn't get rewards for things they didn't contribute to. But ultimately it's the one who brought them in's fault... I mean, stuff like "I'm bringing my lv30 friend to Mortis because he needs his quest stuff" is something I frown upon. Nobody should expect stuff to just be handed down to them. The "Wind of Death" title is a great example indeed. I doubt players can be carried in such a scenario. More of that! But what I meant was that if the whole group works towards the goal, each person should be rewarded. I mean, imagine 5 guildmates battling, say, Destructor. They all put effort into it, but it would be wrong that only the one delivering the finishing blow should get anything. You said that some players in groups shouldn't be rewarded, but didn't mention you were referring to leechers, case in which I completely agree with you.

 

yes, Leechies is what i was referring to sorry i should have worded it better, But the wind of death title you would be surprised , players can be carried through I have seen the weakest players with the title . Clearly having a few hardcore cash guild mates or friends run it to carry them through. Sadly i dont think it can be reworked

 

If one of the achievements is for the dragon-turtle eggs... couldn't the other one be the same thing, but for the flat-water kraken eggs?

Also, does anyone know if you have to keep 'em in your inventory until you get the achievement, or can they be sold without losing the count?

 

The count is automatic. Once you pick them up, you get credit, even if you sell them.

 

Good to know in case I need the inventory space. Thank you!

 

does any one know how many realm frags you need for silver ? I have over 1000 and still did not get the 30points.

 

2K for silver and 10K for gold

 

Thanks

 

So that's why the target for collecting "500" is 2000... I've been wondering if it was a typo or not.

 

will they fix the text of achievement?

 

Some has been working on the achievement lists. The achievement for the turtle mount disappeared.
They will get to it, if and when they get to it.

 

I'm still waiting for my latest 4 completed achievements to actually be the last 4 I got, not the ones for reaching lv20, 45 and two PvP ones (beat 10, respectively 100 players beaten). Aren't achievements magical?

 

There is no turtle mount, please look under Achievements->Companion

 

Dar, there never was a Turtle mount or achiev, just the pet.

 

I stand corrected. The turtle mount was discussed in another post, but not implemented.
The turtle companion achievement was an improperly worded offer for summoning a tenacious dragon turtle, but the temporary pet was insufficient to get credit. It's still offered, if you are willing to buy the pet. LOL.

 

Like you've said yourself, some achievements are simply points for cash. Kinda shameful, really.